Analytical Report Rough Draft
Writing in the Field of Engineering
Archie A. Kipp
University of Iowa
The Role of Writing in Engineering
When people think of engineering they generally don’t tend to associate the profession with writing. Most engineers themselves don’t imagine themselves needing to be a proficient writer or having to structure their writing for different purposes. As an undecided major I was curious as to how writing was utilized in a career path that I was considering in Engineering. Vice President of Technology Services at Burns Engineering, David Kipp, volunteered to talk about how writing is present in his daily activities. He claims that “25-30 percent” of his day consists of writing which he never expected when he entered decided to follow the path towards Electrical Engineering. You must express complex research and data through non-academic and academic styles of writing with various styles of structuring and language.
Non-Academic Writing in Engineering
Most writing in the field of engineering is non-academic. “It’s pretty rare for me to do much academic writing on a daily basis, for the most part I’m writing reports or I’m interacting with clients through emails”. Non-academic writing for Engineering is a variety of genres that mostly involve taking a research process and condensing the data down so that non-specialists can comprehend the information. Another main component of an Engineer’s job is the interacting with a client which contains lots of non-academic writing in the form of emails and letters. These forms of writing differ from academic with respect to the formality of the language and the structure they’re written in.
Language
Engineering is defined by Merriam-Webster to be “the application of science and mathematics by which the properties of matter and the sources of energy in nature are made useful to people”(cite this?). As you begin to get more and more specialized in the field of Engineering, the material becomes indigestible for the average person to able to read. When reporting to the general public, engineers can either report directly to that very broad audience or to a group of journalists who will then simplify even more and reconvey, as a middle man from specialists to everyday readers.
Using more common language is key to simplifying the material. This is exemplified in a website run by Barrie Lawson, an establish engineer, where before diagraming the process of nuclear theory and nuclear fission, he starts by defining all terms that may be misunderstood by any reader (Lawson, para. 2). He understands that his audience is clearly not going to be well versed in the subject he is talking about and for that reason places very direct and simplified definitions. This is an example of a time where the author has forgone journalists and created his own website to filter information to the public directly. One must use even more direction in cases like this.
When writing for journalists, specialists still to have to make sure the language they use is simplified but not to the extent as is necessary for the general public. An example of this type of scenario is the following passage:
The swimmer that we envision (Fig. 1) consists of a soft scaffold on which muscles and neurons are embedded in reconstituted extracellular matrix (ECM) to develop functional neuromuscular units. Our choices regarding scaffold material and geometry, cell sources, and tissue culture techniques are based on 2 main principles, guided self- organization and in situ development, for the formation of muscle tissue constructs and NMJs, respectively.
(Aydin, para. 6)
The author uses lots of words that build a community with its readers like the use of “we” and “our”. The language in this report is pretty relaxed and flows well, a point that David Kipp stated is hard for lots of Engineers saying, “the hard part for most people is to write in an accessible way that’s engaging to read”. Overall engineers writing in a non-academic setting need to be able to write to make their information understandable and flowing so as to keep their readers on topic and interested in their research.
Structure
Organization of writing in Engineering for non-academic writing can be similar to academic writing in scenarios depending on who the intended audience is. It’s not effective to write in the format of a formal report if you are writing for normal people. In a Wired article discussing the new and improved Wi-Fi 6, the author conveys information with headings such as “The Basics” and “How’s it Different?”(Goode, 2019). Very informal and more interesting headers, such as the ones just stated, are more pleasing to read and intended to attract more people.
Other types of writing can be structured very similarly to a research essay when they are writing to journalists and are describing the research, and the results of that research. In a primer, or an introduction to Microgrids, Arindam Maitra uses a structure very similar to a research paper with an abstract, an introduction, and then the substance of what Microgrids are and how they are used (2019). If it’s necessary to explain where results came from and what experimentation led to them, then using that same structure can be very useful. It would be difficult to use the structure for the general public because of the frankness that tends to accompany a research paper.
Academic Writing in Engineering
Academic writing usually comes in the form of a research paper or a report that has been written a highly specialized member of their field that has been reviewed. In engineering it’s written in most cases for other engineers who can benefit from reading their results and analysis. In academic cases there is a specific structure that most reports follow and highly specified language that must be used.
Language
Clarity is the most important piece of language for professional writing just like in non-academic writing. The difference arrises into how technical the language becomes. David Kipp mentioned how “academic writing tends to be much more precise with more references and footnotes that would cloud up the more general writing I do”. Every single fact and piece of information that stemmed from an earlier experiment has to be noted as well as the various figures, charts, graphs, and equations which appear frequently (Huang, 2017, para. 10). These equations are more frequent in academic writing because you must show how you derive truths in certain areas. A good example of how language tends to be more specified is as follows:
Furthermore, LFP:C battery cells show a hysteresis effect and an extremely flat Open
Circuit Voltage (OCV) in an intermediate State of Charge (SOC) range (i.e.,ΔV≤100
ΔV≤100 mV for a SOC range of 10–90%), which is a great challenge for SOC
determination, cell balancing and EMS control on the system level [40,41].
(Hesse, 2017, para. 19)
The language used in this passage is very specific and is almost incomprehensible to a person who doesn’t understand the subject at hand. Word-choice for academic sources must be very accurate and the speech involves lots of numerals and acronyms which are referenced later in the report.
Structure
The structure of engineering reports tend to follow the same guidelines and rules. This tends to be the case so that the specified audience can find what they need in a quick amount of time. At the start will always be an abstract that summarizes the article and quickly runs through the what the report will focus on and the findings of the research (Purdue, 8). This contributes to the clarity of the report so readers can know what information is going to be gathered.
Following the abstract the report will have an introduction, the methodology, and the results of the data. The methodology takes up the majority of the paper because it’s important to know where the findings stem from and to validate if accurate procedures took place.
Conclusion
Engineers write lots in a profession that is centered around science and mathematics. Transitioning from analytical data to communicate to different audiences requires different methods of writing. Through academic and non-academic writing engineers release their findings in websites, journals, and articles. If you are considering the profession of Engineering I hope this gives you more information on how writing is used in this field.
References
Aydin, O., Zhang, X., Nuethong, S., Pagan-Diaz, G. J., Bashir, R., Gazzola, M., & Saif, M. T. A.
(2019, September 13). Neuromuscular actuation of biohybrid motile bots. Retrieved
Goode, L. (2019, August 30). Wi-Fi 6 Will Be Here Soon. What Is It?
Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-wi-fi-6/
Hesse, H. C., Schimpe, M., Kucevic, D., & Jossen, A. (2017, December 11). Lithium-Ion Battery
Storage for the Grid-A Review of Stationary Battery Storage System Design Tailored for
Applications in Modern Power Grids. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/
1996-1073/10/12/2107/htm
Huang, L., Qiu, D., Xie, F., Chen, Y., & Zhang, B. (2017, December 19).
Modeling and Stability Analysis of a Single-Phase Two-Stage
Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System. Retrieved from https://
Lawson, B. (n.d.). Nuclear Energy- The Theory . Retrieved from https://www.mpoweruk.com/
nuclear_theory.htm
Maitra, A., York, B., Kamath, H., Key, T., & Singhvi, V. (1970, January
1). Microgrids : A Primer Introduction - Semantic Scholar.
Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/
Microgrids-:-A-Primer-Introduction-Primer-Maitra/
40a6dd7de702a3b7f3acd5c290b7d63be9b7df89#paper-header
Purdue Writing Lab. (n.d.). Writing Engineering Reports // Purdue
Writing Lab. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/
subject_specific_writing/writing_in_engineering/
writing_engineering_reports.html
Archie,
ReplyDeleteWhen I was reading your paper, the first thing that I noticed was the organization. I thought that you did a good job at providing headings and subheadings. Another thing that you did good on was explaining what academic and nonacademic writing looks like in the field of engineering. I liked that you provided quotes to exemplify what certain types of language looks like. This made your body paragraphs stronger and added more support to your writing.
One thing that I would try to improve on is the sentence structure and grammar used throughout your paper. I noticed that some of your sentences tended to get a little wordy. For example, in your 5th. paragraph you wrote “the author uses lots of words that build a community with its readers like the use of “we” and our”.” To make the sentence flow a little better, I would replace it with “The author uses words such as “we” and ''our” to build a community with the readers”. I would suggest reading your paper again and looking over your sentences.
Another thing that I would focus on is making sure that you explain why you used certain quotes or definitions. For example, the second sentence in paragraph 2 is a quote that doesn’t state who said it. You also don’t really explain why you used it in your paper. Another example can be found when you defined the term “engineering”. You could expand a little more on why you chose to use the definition.
The last thing that I would focus on is making sure that you use the right format. For your cover page, make sure to have the header say: Running head: WRITING IN ENGINEERING. Also change your font to Times New Roman, size 12, and double spaced. If I were you, I would copy and paste my paper into google doc or word document. By doing this, you can make sure that your format is exactly what it needs to be.
Archie, overall I thought that your paper had good organization. I thought you had good subheadings and I also thought that you did a really good job explaining academic and non-academic writing in the field of engineering. You had a lot of strong quotes that supported your writing but I thought you had a good amount of your own writing which is good!
ReplyDeleteOne thing that I noticed for improvement is structure and grammar. Throughout your paper you many sentences that had one too many words or needed to be reworded. For example in your sixth paragraph your last sentence said “Overall engineers writing in a non-academic setting need to be able to write to make their information understandable and flowing so as to keep their readers on topic and interested in their research.” Another thing I noticed with structure and grammar is that you use “lots” multiple times throughout your paper which I would change to “a lot,” “many,” or “several.” I also couldn’t find your thesis which should be stated in your introduction paragraph as well as your conclusion. In your paper I highlighted other sentences that I thought you should reword and tried to give an alternative for each of them and I crossed out extra words in your sentences that I didn’t think you needed.
The second thing I noticed for improvement are your citations and the format of them. For example in your second paragraph you said in quotes “It’s pretty rare for me to do much academic writing on a daily basis, for the most part I’m writing reports or I’m interacting with clients through emails”. You didn’t cite or reference anyone/journal/ article for this quote and you should also put the period before the late quotation mark. I thought this might have been from an interview in which case you should say “I interviewed a professional in the field of engineering that said…” If this wasn’t from an interview though you didn’t have any part of your interview in your paper which you should do. I also noticed you left out some things in the citations you did have like paragraph four you had “(Lawson, para.2)” but no date. If you can’t find the date make sure you put “(Lawson, no date, para.2).”
The last thing I noticed for improvement is the APA format. Make sure you have “Running head: WRITING IN ENGINEERING” as a header for the title page only and then “WRITING IN ENGINEERING” for the pages that follow. Also look at your font, font size, and spacing. Your font should be Times New Roman with a size 12 font and double spaced.